chapter eighteen
CHAPTER EIGHTEEN. CENSORSHIP IN THE LUCY LETBY CASE.
The Lucy Letby trial was conducted in an egregiously biased, and prejudicial, and unfair manner, with exculpatory evidence hidden from the jury, and general “smoke and mirrors” tactics. This was so blatant that the general public is now beginning to recognise it as a miscarriage of justice. In that case, the “establishment” has to scurry around to fabricate a “cover-up” involving an attempted CENSORSHIP of any discussion of the issue. The first CENSORSHIP tactic is to accuse anyone questioning the verdict of “insensitivity” towards the parents of the deceased babies. The following quotes illustrate this CENSORSHIP strategy:-
Here is a quote from the internet:-
“The judge had previously warned that questions raised over the killer nurse's conviction were becoming increasingly distressing for the parents whose children had died or been harmed in her care”. (My comment:- This is pious nonsense – all part of the “cover-up”.)
This above quote was found on the following web page:-
Error ridden Lucy Letby door-swipe data was used in cases of eight other babies
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/lucy-letby-door-swipe-data-was-used-in-cases-of-eight-other-babies/
Here is another quote from a U-Tube video:-
The police and the hospital and crown prosecution service cannot give information, in respect of The Freedom of Information Act because of the ongoing investigation. (My comment:- They do not want the public to know the facts of the case, because full disclosure of the facts would reveal the extreme incompetence and dishonesty of the investigation and the trial.) This quote is to be found on the following U-Tube video:-
Lucy Letby: The Jimmy Savile Factor
According to Carl in The UK.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dA3EUPfNZtQ
Here is another quote from a U-Tube video:- The prosecutor (of Lucy Letby) states that “Anyone doubting the case should be ashamed of themselves. The disregard that the so-called experts have had for the families is quite frankly disgraceful”. (My comment:- Again – pious nonsense – all part of the “cover up”.) This quote is to be found on the following U-Tube video:-
Lucy Letby: Medical Experts Speak Out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4s08JzfSKk
Here is a quote from the (London) Metro, February 18th 2025, page 4:- Waging a campaign over nurse Lucy Letby’s conviction is “not the right thing to do” health secretary Wes Streeting has warned - - - urged campaigners to look to the established legal process - - - “I would ask people to consider those grieving parents who’ve lost their babies”. (My comment:- More “cover-up”.)
Here are some quotes from a U-Tube video
(The) Amazing Academics (U-Tube series). Serial Killers and Statistical Blunders - Why Lucy Letby might be wrongly imprisoned: John O'Quigley
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbN6j-IPQAU
Professor John O’Quigley, Professor of Statistics at University College, London states that the journal Medicine, Science, and Law rejected Professor O’Quigley’s paper on the Letby case because “it would be insensitive to the families of the babies.”
Professor O’Quigley QUOTE:- “In the case of Lucy Letby, I know many statisticians - - - who agree (that she is innocent), but say that the time is not right for me to speak out – so people are obviously intimidated - - - and will not say what they think”.
Here is a quote from Private Eye Special Report. The Lessons of The Lucy Letby Case, by Doctor Phil Hammond. MD. (available online.)
Private Eye Report, part 15:- The embarrassment of such a catastrophic miscarriage would be so great to the legal establishment, that there would be pressure on the CCRC to slow down the appeals process.
Private Eye Report, part 8:- Letby’s new barrister Mark McDonald has been refused permission to attend the Thirwall inquiry (which will look into the case) to provide her with legal representation.
The following quote is from the article in The New Yorker (issue for May 20th, 2024) by Rachel Aviv, entitled – A Reporter at Large – Conviction, page 44:- One of Letby’s childhood friends - - - her loyalty to Letby has already caused her - - - professional problems.
This next quote is from The Daily Telegraph February 6th, 2025, page 4:- Lady Justice Thirwall dismissed the genuine concerns as “noise” that caused “enormous stress” for the victims’ families. (My comment:- Again, pious nonsense to assist the attempted “cover-up”!)
I myself talked to a barrister about this case. He commented as follows:- “Obviously she’s innocent. It’s a massive F(expletive deleted)-up. But she’ll have to stay in jail. It would be too embarrassing to the legal system to let her out.” I asked him – “What about truth and justice?” He replied “F(expletive deleted) truth and justice! It’s about winning! We have to win. That’s the name of the game! It’s about maintaining law and order. It would be anarchy otherwise! You can’t undermine people’s trust in our legal system.” (My comment:- !!!!!??????)